How to Tell if your Nonprofit is Prone to Fraud or Conflicts of Interest

Rebounding from ethics and fraud issues is time-consuming and costly. Nonprofit organizations do struggle to obtain damages, and some may never fully recover from the long-term damages of fraud and ethics blunders. Fraud occurs by both organizations as well as by employees for personal gain and abuse of power.

Some people may think that audits tend to cost nonprofit organizations more than the cost of many of their accountants or internal financial staff. However, this ignores the fact that unnoticed fraud and abuse causes many tangible and intangible damages to an organization.

What easily shocks me and perhaps other managers is the high number of nonprofit organizations that are without ethical training of any kind. They may have a piece of paper that floats from one end of the business to the other, or maybe it too often lands in the circular trash file. By not teaching ethics, employees do not apply or practice ethics.

Nonprofit organizations also generally need to do a better job of judging conflicts of interests. Are your directors or managers fielding people to your organization or getting a kickback or payoff? Is there a conflict of interest? How does hiring of employees occur? Is a manager or director only hiring personal contacts?

Here is an example of where ethics and boundaries create issues in nonprofit organizations. A department head runs a side business and hires the side business staff to the nonprofit department. The result is that the nonprofit simultaneously employs staff working for the department head’s side company. The department head has the nonprofit pay for all education and training provided to the department head’s side business staff that the nonprofit simultaneously employs. The side business competes for the same market customers as the department, or for which the department could easily add due to staff talent. Nonprofit staff joins the side business. What is the problem with this scenario? The problem is that this is taking advantage of the nonprofit, in addition to being a conflict of interest that manifests in customer poaching. It is an issue of loyalties. The conflict of interest issue triggers the question, who is really benefiting whom?

If you have an internal store, or consulting arm to your nonprofit, this scenario is exactly why you want to have an ethics policy, procedure, and annual required training in your organization. What is the director or manager’s relationship with other managers that are coming into the department?

Is the hired employee loyal to the nonprofit or to a conflict of interest? A conflict of interest can be personal, such as a relationship or friendship. It can also be substantive, such as an employee of a director or manager’s personal side business. It is time to look at your conflict of interest policy. Are your managers and directors accountable for ensuring that they do not mix your nonprofit business interest with their personal or business interests, especially for personal gain?

A manager or employee who diminishes small unethical behavior tends to escalate behaviors because the act, to him or her, is not so big; these histories lead to more troubling acts and larger ethics problems.

Another general problem within a nonprofit is cash control. Do you know what is done to ensure cash control? How does the marketing manager or event manager account for funds raised at events? Does your organization have operating procedures? These controls are management controls. More and more organizations are realizing that fraud occurs in many forms.

Fraud can also be a theft of funds or actions meant to defraud. Theft of assets can be hidden in accounting records in not so discrete ways. Fraud off the books can occur with anything ranging from loss of cash sales to cash donations.

Some key indicators of fraud and ethics issues are:

  1. Missing or destroyed records or documents. An Employee may inquire into a history, for instance, 10 years of records, only to discover there are no records or significant histories of records are gone. They are told about a computer record system, but no one knows the login or password and those records are also gone. This reflects a common control problem. Lost passwords or not tracking passwords of the internal record system can generate unnecessary and time-consuming work. If 10 years of records were stored in an online location or other system, if a department is not rigorously keeping up on password changes, a significant data loss occurred. Without adequate records, a nonprofit will not be able to pass state audits or other independent audits.
  2. Management wants little to no detail in purchase orders, receipt records, or AP records. Accounts payable fraud is challenging for organizations. An employee from a culture of controls will likely record why there is a price differential between purchases and activities, even small amounts, to prevent fraud. When a price differential occurs between the same or similar purchases, sometimes it is due to a discount, such as a service quality discount, and this does not always show up on a receipt. Too many returns, voids, and refunds internally can also signal a fraud problem.
  3. Organization has a very high staff turnover. Is the organization really a victim of the economy? This is where an organization’s representations in interviews to job candidates can get them into trouble. If a candidate asks whether the organization’s staff loss is a layoff, a representation that it is not a layoff, or that it is positive, can be fraud, depending upon your employment state law, because the employer is intentionally or negligently misrepresenting the financial status of the nonprofit to the candidate in order to induce a candidate to accept employment. It is best to be honest about layoffs when asked. If your department has a staff turnover problem, look at job analysis and organizational development to increase engagement. This may also help to prevent fraud and ethics issues.
  4. No standard Code of Ethics exists in the organization. Alternatively, if the Code of Ethics exists, fraud and ethics issues arise when it is not enforced or taught and applied in an annual required employee training.
  5. The Conflict-of-interest policy is inadequate or not enforced. The organization may lack proper screening questions in a standard hiring process.

By establishing more management controls and teaching the Code of Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy annually, your nonprofit will be less likely to experience ethical issues, fraud, and any conflicts of interest.

White House states NO change to NPO tax deduction

White House declares NPOs unscathed by TAX DEDUCTION- The Nonprofit Quarterly

After reading through the Non-profit Quarterly highlights, I was able to breathe a half way pleasant sigh of relief after reviews of Obama’s State of the Union address declared his proposal for tax deduction (e.g. Buffett Rule) would not effect Non profit organizations, only “the wealthy” (those who make over 1 million dollars per year).

At first, the Non profit Quarterly stated that Obama’s proposed Buffett Rule would greatly impact NPOs but, they were quickly corrected after receiving confirmation from sources inside the White House that NPOs would not be affected (FOR NOW…).

If you would like to read the article in detail, please visit the Nonprofit Quarterly website for a full analysis and article preview:

http://www.nonprofitquarterly.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19416:white-house-official-tells-npq-no-change-to-charitable-tax-deductions-planned&catid=153:features&Itemid=336

Link to Youtube: coverage of Obama’s Buffett plan:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VnwRo7DrNM

 

Break Out of the Tired Old Social Media Box

the article begins with “It’s time to teach that old dog some new tricks.
That old dog I’m referring to is social media.
Sure, you’re already blogging, and on Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+, Facebook, and more. Great.
But I’m telling you — there’s more to social media than meets the eye. The final chapter on social media hasn’t been written.
When I kicked off my writing business in April, I decided to use social media my way.
I approached these overused networks as if I’d never heard of them. I made my own rules. I set different expectations. You could say I wrote my own chapter on social media marketing.
It made my website — and my business — better.
Here’s what I came up with, and how you can incorporate these features into your own marketing plan.”

more information, see http://www.copyblogger.com/creative-social-media/

philanthropist.org, Inc. Welcomes Joi, Laurent, Ryan, Linza, and Yi

Joi Garron is a freelance/ volunteer Graphic artist from the Metrowest area of Massachusetts. She attended Framingham State University where she received her Bachelor degree in Graphic Design and Visual Communications. Afterward, Joi continued her education by attending the 3D arts program at Boston University’s Center for Digital Imaging arts in Waltham, Ma where she received her certification in 3D animation arts. Joi volunteers as a Graphic artist and decorator/ designer for yearly company galas and functions. Also, she co-organizes the Boston Maya User’s group, a 3D artist meetup which connects monthly in the Boston area and freelances as an artist with Boston Indies groups releasing game assets/platforms for mobile devices, etc. in 2012.

Mary Cross is an experienced management consultant and marketing and business development executive. Currently the Managing Director of JKJ Associates, Inc., Mary has worked with a number of companies in the software, internet, and business services spaces. She has held senior management positions in marketing, business development, strategic alliances, and practice management. She has also held leadership positions in several non-profits and has extensive experience working with teenagers in a variety of service environments. She was Director of Strategic Alliances at Expert Central, Director of Marketing at The Bentley Group, a TSC Company, and Practice Director, Internal IT and Help Desk Practice at The Bentley Group. She also held roles as Product Marketing Manager at Palladian Software and elsewhere. Mary holds a BS Computer Science and Mathematics from Vanderbilt University and MS Management from MIT Sloan School of Management.

Ryan Flynn-Kasuba is a financial analyst at Ropes & Gray LLP. This position has given him exposure to various aspects of the financial side of a business including cash management, treasury, taxes and financial projections. Ryan has also had some experience in other aspects of the financial industry through various internships in investment banking, restructuring/financial consulting and equity research. Ryan is a co-founder and Vice President of the UMass Alumni Finance Group, a networking group for both UMass and non-UMass business professionals in Boston. He is also an active member on the Finance Committee for the UMass Amherst Alumni Association. Ryan is also a Big Brother volunteer for the Big Brothers Big Sister Program. Ryan graduated summa cum laude from UMass Amherst in the Fall of 2009 with a BBA in Finance and minors in German and Spanish.

Bobby Mills went to school at Newbury College for Business Mgt. and has worked in the mortgage industry for about 11 years before getting into Non Profit and Philanthropy. Early on, he served on the executive board for NAACP in Brockton MA, and in 2000, started his journey in the mortgage industry. He began as a loan processor, taking time to learn the business and procedures before transitioning to a loan officer position and closing more than $187 million in sales over the duration of his career. He worked with a few various companies including Homestar Mortgage & Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. His final stage in the residential market was with Maverick Residential Mortgage as a senior mortgage consultant. Then slowly transitioned and started his own commercial mortgage consultant firm in early 2007, Mills & Goldberg Financial, LLC, with a team of five consultants. He was the senior consultant and supported the entire team in self-sourcing and marketing businesses to qualify, as well as helping to qualify future loan applicants for commercial mortgages. He later closed that business in early 2010. Today, he is the creator and founder of M&G Foundation, a service that helps young adults and new entrepreneurs succeed in the business world. He is also networking with several other agencies involved in helping children and now philanthropy. Bobby realized how important it is to uphold integrity in a crumbling business world where this is not so, and his business focus capitalizes on that idea!

Yi Lin, PhD. comes from China, and is studing at Babson. Before came to Babson, Yi Lin worked for management software consulting company for several years and was also involved in two non-profit organizations, which raised his interests in philanthropy. He took the program manager role and led the program to more professional by introducting project management; In the other organization which is located in Boston, he took the project assistant and responsible for working out new initiatives and seeking volunteer resources. Both are related to child education.

Linza You comes from China and now is studying MBA in Hult Internatioanl Business School. Before came here, she worked as a relationship manager in HSBC for two years, and later worked as a talent agent for another two years. She created and conceived promotional strategies across all media platforms and generated business engagements for the talents. At the same time, she raised capital from investors, recruited production team, and managed production process music videos for them. She is now helping Hult to do some marketing thing in China, such as post blogs on forum and Chinese version twitter mirco-blog Sina. Linza always has interest in helping other people, especially poor people. She thinks Philanthropist.org work is very meaningful.

Kristofer Mondlane; graduate of Tufts University in International Relations has acted as integrated marketing consultant for philanthropist from late 2011 adding to his two year career as a marketing consultant. Before that, Kris spent two years as a business development consultant helping prominent international security contractors secure government and private contracts.

Laurent Bouzelmat is a french civil engineer. He worked for two major construction companies in France, Russia, Cuba and Dubai as a civil engineer and project manager. Laurent came to Boston to study entrepreneurship at Boston university. Laurent has experience in production management and contract management. Laurent is graduated from the Sorbonne University ( Mechanicals) and from the civil engineering school of Paris. Laurent speaks french, english, spanish and a few russian. Laurent holds a graduation from the Boston University school of management in Entrepreneurial Leadership.

philanthropist.org adds new volunteers, Welcome Bobby Mills!

Bobby Mills went to school at Newbury College for Business Mgt. and has worked in the mortgage industry for about 11 years before getting into Non Profit and Philanthropy. Early on, he served on the executive board for NAACP in Brockton MA, and in 2000, started his journey in the mortgage industry. He began as a loan processor, taking time to learn the business and procedures before transitioning to a loan officer position and closing more than $187 million in sales over the duration of his career. He worked with a few various companies including Homestar Mortgage & Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. His final stage in the residential market was with Maverick Residential Mortgage as a senior mortgage consultant. Then slowly transitioned and started his own commercial mortgage consultant firm in early 2007, Mills & Goldberg Financial, LLC, with a team of five consultants. He was the senior consultant and supported the entire team in self-sourcing and marketing businesses to qualify, as well as helping to qualify future loan applicants for commercial mortgages. He later closed that business in early 2010. Today, he is the creator and founder of M&G Foundation, a service that helps young adults and new entrepreneurs succeed in the business world. He is also networking with several other agencies involved in helping children and now philanthropy. Bobby realized how important it is to uphold integrity in a crumbling business world where this is not so, and his business focus capitalizes on that idea!

philanthropist.org adds new team members, Welcome Ryan!

Ryan Flynn-Kasuba is a financial analyst at Ropes & Gray LLP. This position has given him exposure to various aspects of the financial side of a business including cash management, treasury, taxes and financial projections. Ryan has also had some experience in other aspects of the financial industry through various internships in investment banking, restructuring/financial consulting and equity research. Ryan is a co-founder and Vice President of the UMass Alumni Finance Group, a networking group for both UMass and non-UMass business professionals in Boston. He is also an active member on the Finance Committee for the UMass Amherst Alumni Association. Ryan is also a Big Brother volunteer for the Big Brothers Big Sister Program. Ryan graduated summa cum laude from UMass Amherst in the Fall of 2009 with a BBA in Finance and minors in German and Spanish.

Corporate Social Responsibility as Strategy: What is it? What Does it Take?

Social responsibility is not the enemy of profitability of corporations. Corporate governance scandals, like insider trading, often seem to get more media attention than the socially responsible actions of a business. Is social responsibility an enemy of corporate profit? Profit is part of what equates to social responsibility.

What is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)?

Society expects social responsibility. These activities are not mandated but they differ from ethical requirements. These activities reflect in the brand or the public and community expectations of businesses.

What is the CSR Pyramid?

CSR is illustrated in the pyramid format. This pyramid is not a sequential analysis, such as requiring starting at the base of making a profit. Business expectations mean fulfilling these responsibilities concurrently. Corporate sustainability is also considered part of CSR under the Carrol model.

The base is making a profit. This is an economic responsibility. In order to be successful, a business must also obey the law, as it is also a core codification of right and wrong by society. Next, a business must be ethical to do what is right, just, and fair. This minimizes harm to stakeholders. Last, a business at the top of the pyramid has a discretionary responsibility for being a good corporate citizen. This means that the corporation works to contribute financial and other resources to improve the community and quality of life.

The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Credit: http://labspace.open.ac.uk/file.php/4778/!via/oucontent/course/132/pyramid.gif

The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Credit: http://labspace.open.ac.uk/file.php/4778/!via/oucontent/course/132/pyramid.gif

How do Corporations Practice Social Responsibility?

Corporations often have corporate giving programs, scholarships, donations, strategic partnerships with nonprofits, NGOs, and governments, and often require or recommend volunteer service from their employees. Employees may be required to work in the community with key stakeholders for humanitarian needs as a means of stewarding good corporate citizenship.

What are the Standards of Corporate Social Responsibility?

Corporations often set their own standards and expectations for their own tactical and long-term goals with CSR.

Some nonprofits and NGOs view corporations venturing into social issues an issue of expertise about social issues, something that specialized nonprofits and NGOs tend to have a clearer perspective garnered by experience. This thinking creates strategy issues for corporations as well as nonprofits and NGOs. Rather than view each other as strategic partners or consider the ability of forming creative alliances, strategy weakens under an attitudinal belief about who is better suited for the job of addressing social issues.

How Does a Corporation Strategically Plan and Evaluate CSR?

Businesses evaluate CSR by considering economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic and discretionary expectations.

Businesses analyze performance metrics for strategic planning purposes. Top decision makers must align strategy and gather data. They must also decide how management will support CSR and who will monitor and run CSR. Some corporations have departments charged with CSR responsibilities while others have a single individual in charge of CSR management. Corporations audit the performance of CSR programs by using social audits targeting the performance of CSR. Corporations may also generate strategic strategies and performance data based on strategic partnerships and alliances in the community.

The results of CSR often improve community and the perception of a brand, product, or business. Employees learn new skills and both the community and nonprofits and NGOs served by the programs generate shared efforts of improved strategy and engagement.

 

The Obesity at Work and School Problem: What is a Nonprofit and NGO Board to Do?

While childhood obesity has increased over the past years, we now have a rising concern of advertising attacking self-esteem of children. Research has shown that kids are not biking or walking to school as much anymore. Research also finds that children are drawn to packages of food with their favorite cartoon characters. Gallup reports that slightly fewer Americans were obese in 2011, but the data demonstrate that obesity is still too high. A research analysis report estimated that the total cost of obesity to the U.S. economy is as much as $270 billion; Gallup found that obesity and related chronic health issues cost businesses an estimated 150 billion annually. We have workplaces that have so many sick days and employees absent from work due to obesity, that it lowers America’s GDP.

Here’s an infographic about obesity worldwide:

Obesity Worldwide Infographic

Obesity Worldwide Infographic (Via The Inforgraphic Showcase; Credit: http://www.infographicsshowcase.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ObesityLrg.jpg).

Shocking the audience into better behavior with an advertisement seems to have the same goal of scared straight programs for criminals. Shock and terrify the audience, to get a desired behavior change. The debate about acceptable advertising is increasing as advertisements display and target very young children with harsh words targeting perception and self-esteem about being overweight.

These advertisements succeed in going viral due to their brashness, which perhaps is a great way to generate a public service announcement or awareness campaign, but is it truly meaningful or is it hurtful to the business and brand? Do the means of shocking the audience justify the result, if more children become healthy? Is confidence in a brand’s ethics at risk?

I recently watched a movie, Freakonomics, where young underachieving students are bribed with incentives, including cash and prize drawings that included a limo ride home if they improved classroom achievement. These incentives work for younger children, but according to the Freakonomics economists, research has proven that incentives do not work as successfully for older children. Could children be bribed to lose weight? Are schools, teachers, and parents delivering lessons of nutrition and health?

Is there an issue of self-esteem and social relationships among obese children? Research posted in Freakonomics’ blog explores racial factors affecting body image and weight. Research finds that poor people are not necessarily more likely to be obese than non-poor people and people are less likely to be obese if they are patient. Additionally, children with overweight parents and peers are more likely than not to have flawed perceptions of healthy body weight.

Research finds that obese adults and those with chronic health conditions create business performance problems for their workplaces. According to data reported by Freakonomics:

About 86% of full-time American workers are above normal weight or have at least one chronic condition. These workers miss a combined estimate of 450 million more days of work each year than their healthy counterparts, resulting in an estimated cost of more than $153 billion in lost productivity per year. That’s roughly 1% of GDP.

Research gathered by Freakonomics also addresses that decreased cigarette smoking has led to a minority increase in obesity because cigarette smoking affects weight.

Considering a business’ needs, there is no question that health is an economic problem for the country and for any business, particularly a nonprofit and NGO business, especially where workers are missing so much work due to sick days.

If it is affecting GDP, it could also be affecting your business’ performance dashboard. Economists highlight that there are many more incentives for gaining weight then there are for losing weight.

Should your business incentivize good health? Many businesses are starting to do just that. The incentives may show promise of improving workplace wellness and health of employees.

What Should Your Nonprofit and NGO Board Do about Obesity?

  1. Human capital has a major impact across all areas of your nonprofit and NGO business. Businesses understand human capital risks to major projects. However, consider the impact across other functional responsibilities and areas of the business. Evaluate the full nature of business performance. Can human resources and wellness officers improve strategy of healthy incentives and wellness programs? Do these programs improve business performance and health?
  2. Obesity may be an ADA impairment that requires a reasonable accommodation and discrimination can result in a legal case. Harsh words about body image and obesity could generate legal issues. 
  3. Consult with legal counsel about advertising and programs targeting employees and others served by the nonprofit and NGO. 
  4. Consider how implementing policies and practices create a positive business and working climate for all people. 
  5. Nonprofits and NGOs are using scare tactics to grab quick viral press attention. These ads may be targeting attention of media more than the children may be viewing them, but is it really ethical and responsible? Should your board consider issues of responsibility in advertising more carefully?

Would incentives be more successful at achieving a healthy result? The assumption of these nonprofits and NGOs is that their advertisements do not do any harm to the health of the children targeted. If the goal is health, children viewing these advertisements may resort to unhealthy behaviors in order to achieve a desired “healthy” image.Considering hospitals are running these campaigns, does that really align with a healthcare industry whose core basic tenet is doing no harm?

A brand and nonprofit and NGO business should be careful that it does not endanger its ethics in the process of advocating greater personal responsibility for health dangers. Its responsibility, depending on the industry, may be greater than that of those individuals targeted harshly in advertising.

Although healthy living is a personal responsibility, incentives and careful action by nonprofit and NGOS may inspire greater weight loss achievement in target populations. This ultimately may resolve the business performance issues created by obesity and chronic health issues. In turn, a significant burden on the economy and businesses may be alleviated.

Americans lead the world in giving

At a time, when America is fragile economically, fractured politically and splintered from

Americans give money- time- help

civil unrest, we are a people and a nation of givers.  If we share one core value it is in our charitable acts. According to a global CAR survey Americans rate (60%), number one in philanthropy in the 2011 global survey, the highest score ever. Two out of three Americans said “they donated money to charity (65 percent), more than two out of five volunteered their time (43 percent) and roughly three out of four helped a stranger (73 percent), up from a ranking of five in 2010. [1]

150,000 people are interviewed each year from a 153 countries; surveys are carried out over the phone or in person.  The World of Giving Index survey for the first time allowed respondents to tweet their responses to #WorldGivingIndex

People are asked three behavioral questions.  In the last month did you:

  1. Donate money to charity?
  2. Volunteer your time to an organization?
  3. Help a stranger, or someone you know?

Despite the global financial difficulty, the world is giving more too. “In 2010, the global average of the three giving behaviors was 31.6. In 2011 this had risen to 32.4%. The increase in giving is in helping strangers and volunteering time, the actual donation of dollars has fallen.  The data also shows that at different life stages giving shifts. As we age we are more likely to help strangers.  Wealth and giving are not synonymous. Countries whose populations are more likely to give are the less affluent.   Global giving has no boundaries and the reach is vast, Asia has seen the largest growth in giving this year.

CAF annual report recommendations encourage governments to collaborate with NGOs and the private sector.  With the rise of social networking it’s never been a better time to use tools like Cause.com, Facebook and Twitter to collaborate with and support charities, develop and foster positive social impact. Effective communication tools will measure monitor and engage with donors and funders.  It’s time to invest in effective volunteer infrastructure which provides a platform to bring like-minded people together to share their passion for philanthropy, charity and causes.

Companies can play an important role in fostering a culture of philanthropy and supporting social causes in which improve the life and health of its population.  It’s good for their bottom line too. Corporations which are leading in philanthropy must do a better job of communicating the work that they do.  Can we imagine the possibility of using social networking tools to bring companies together with charities and donors building partnerships and communities of giving and support?

 

Philanthropy in a nation of homelessness

One hundred, philanthropists, social investors, work-a-teers and bighearted people associated with www.philanthropist.org gathered to celebrate philanthropist.org, philanthropy and generous acts of kindness at its 2nd annual fun-raiser event at the Harvard Peabody Museum on December 6, 2011.

Keynote speaker, Ken Melchin, CEO of www.sugarcrm.com, spoke about the importance of giving back, the value of philanthropy and a big heart. He challenged those in the room to consider how we pick and choose activities which make us feel most comfortable in our philanthropic endeavors while we shrink from the day-to-day uncomfortable situations and interactions with homelessness social ills and poverty. How many times have we walked across a street when we see a homeless person? When was the last time we looked someone in the eye, rather than look away when we hear, “can you spear some change?”

The wealthiest nation in the world allows 33% of its most vulnerable population, children, to live in poverty and homelessness. The most powerful country allows elderly, children and the less fortunate to go to bed every night hungry. Is our philanthropy activities our way of appeasing our conscious? Do we volunteer to feel better about ourselves, our lives, what we believe and value?  We celebrate acts of philanthropy while millions of Americans are without food, jobs, health insurance, homes and hope.

The road to prosperity has created a nation of haves and have-not. How is it that the most generous individuals, businesses and companies do not see or want to solve the problem of the invisible people in America?  We justify the poverty crisis by our own set of cultural, economic, social and political values.  We watch banks take government funds and people’s homes. We scream at the thought of helping our neighbors, strangers, why should they hold on to their homes? It would not be fair to those of us who have worked so hard and played by the rules. The notion we can pull ourselves up by the boot strap is the hallmark of America’s strength. However, what happens if the straps are rigged?

Donald Trump, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich talk about the social ills of poverty. They mock the poor for not having role models while touting their own wealth and privilege. Are these the values which make our country great? The very government which facilitated their own wealth also bailed out the banks, gave tax breaks to large corporations under the name of capitalism. However, when the government tries to alleviate the burden of the working and middle class, implementing universal access to health care or providing financial assistance, or extending unemployment benefits, it’s labeled socialism. Can someone please provide a rational for this logic?

Risk of Social Data to Your Corporate Board and Brand

Nonprofits and NGOs will need to enhance capabilities to ensure that corporate data is not exposed by public search sites or social media. Responsibility is shifting to businesses and employers to effectively monitor and prevent breach of company data. Emerging cloud and social data integrated technologies will only increase data risks.

Tips to Protect Your Nonprofit and NGO Corporate Board and Brand:

  1. Use Social Media Monitoring. Sites like Reppler measure your content appropriateness and privacy for free. Go to http://www.reppler.com/. The site provides information on how others can perceive you in social networks based on the content you place there. The site also provides a bird’s eye view of networks and personal information there and flags inappropriate conduct that can be edited or updated as well as privacy and security risks, including issues that might create a Facebook hack incident.
  2. Limit business data and personal data like full birthdays which can be used for company compliance and identity verification. Some employers can require birthdays as a means of fraud verification on company banking cards. With the increased personal data in the digital space, including with public search sites, such as Yatedo and Spokeo, Nonprofit and NGOs face a heightened risk of employee impersonation and identity theft.
  3. Consider business policy and education. Is there a need for business policy about not posting social data used for employee verification? Is there a need to block social media in high-risk strategic work areas within your organization? Educate your employees about how public data can be used for fraud. Employees should be taught that corporate and employee department bank cards can be recreated based on activities online and employee data availability, resulting in white card fraud.

Although some insurance and management controls may exist, nonprofit and NGOs, may not be able to afford the same level of management controls and data monitoring used by corporate businesses. They may find that the speed of data discovery requires a live monitoring and rapid response. Nonprofits and NGOs using social media should consider increasing limitations of employee access to company branded social media accounts, or block employee use of social media, if they cannot afford to monitor it. This can help to prevent an issue of brand harm from impersonation or data breach.

By teaching employees more about the risk of data and personal information availability due to social media, the organizational risk and inefficiency issue created to respond to breach or fraud activities may be avoided.

Setting a record straight

The appearance of Karl Rove and his Wall Street Allies in the most recent attack ad against Elizabeth Warren clearly demonstrates that anything will be said or done in order to attempt to derail her campaign. Republicans will use millions to try to defeat her, but Elizabeth has two things money can’t buy: truth and peoples’ values. Current economic and social disparities are real. How people perceive them vary according to their values and their positions on the economic and social ladders.

Elizabeth Warren believes in a level playing field; she is deeply committed to middle and working class families’ economic health and well being.  She was an out spoken critic of no strings attached for Wall Street TARP. Elizabeth was asked to serve on the Congressional Oversight Panel and was charged with helping to hold the government and the banks accountable for how TARP money was distributed and spent.

She consistently criticized the Bush administration (and later the Obama administration) for failing to hold the banks accountable and failing to put safeguards in place to ensure that the banks used the funds to loosen up the credit market—instead of on big bonuses for top executives.

Rove’s ad has been widely criticized for being dishonest and inaccurate. 

The attack ad has been called “full of absurd distortions,” (Brian McGrory, The Boston Globe, 12/9/11);  “one of the most disingenuous and inaccurate ads of the 2012 cycle,” (Ari Berman, The Nation, 12/8/11); that “twists Elizabeth Warren’s role as a Congressionally-appointed watchdog,” (ABC News)

Elizabeth was named one of the “new sheriffs of Wall Street” by Time Magazine and was named Bostonian of the Year by the Boston Globe for bringing “a sense of sanity to the economic crisis.”

“It seemed as if the banks and other firms got a $700 billion bonanza and the American taxpayer got the shaft. But along came this straight-shooting Harvard professor to oversee the bailout, someone who pledged to look out for the middle class and brought a sense of sanity to the economic crisis. For this we give her our top honors this year.” (The Boston Globe 12/20/09)

Rove himself supported the bailout and never supported any measures to hold Wall Street accountable.

Rove said, “…if we let the banks fail the rest of the economy will fail, which is why everybody agreed let’s just step in and save our financial system, our credit markets.” (Fox News, 12/05/08)

Please find two links that help debunk Rove’s smears:

http://www.thebostonchannel.com/video/29955629/detail.html

http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2011/12/09/reasonchangechannel/4LNVGgrFPn6sOf96Cf8tJN/story.html

Crowd-funding push back?

Some good news out of Washington, four bills one of which is the Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act, HR 2930, was passed by the House of Representatives by an overwhelming majority.  The road to implementation at the state level is already causing some push back. Below are four important acts which have the potential of jump starting and driving new economic growth.

1)  Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act, HR 2930– This bill would allow businesses to accept and pool donations of up to $1 million (or $2 million in some instances) without requiring SEC registration.  This concept is known as crowd-funding, which involves the pooling of small contributions in an effort to help others attain a specific goal. If this bill were to become law, it would preempt state law, would permit access to capital sources that previously were untapped, and would prevent the new shareholders from being counted toward the SEC’s 500 shareholder limit for non-public companies.

2)  The Access to Capital for Job Creators Act (HR 2940) – This bill would remove the general solicitation and advertising ban from SEC Rule 506 under Regulation D.  This change would permit small businesses to solicit investments from accredited investors throughout the U.S. and globally.  Like the crowd funding bill, HR 2940 would provide greater access to capital sources.  It would also modernize the way Regulation D offerings are conducted by allowing businesses to directly advertise to accredited investors.

3)  HR 1965 – This bill with no name would increase the number of shareholders bank holding companies and banks may have before requiring SEC registration.  Currently, companies are required to go public if they have 500 or more shareholders and have $10 million or more in assets.  The bill would allow community bank holding companies to have up to 2,000 investors before requiring registration.  As such, community banks would have greater access to capital without requiring added SEC regulation.

4)  Small Company Capital Formation Act (HR 1070) – This bill would increase the limit on SEC Regulation A offerings from $5 million to $50 million.  Regulation A provides a streamlined way for small businesses to raise capital and has fewer requirements than the typical SEC registered offering, but Regulation A has not kept up with the times.  Very few companies view Regulation A as a viable alternative because the current $5 million cap generally does not provide sufficient capital.  The bill would allow small businesses to raise up to $50 million, which makes Regulation A- a viable alternative again. http://www.gunster.com/2011/12/house-votes-to-make-capital-raising-easier/

Senator Scott Brown, Massachusetts State Senator, wrote another, Democratizing Access to Capital Act of 2011, S 1791.  According to the author it, “would allow small companies to offer shares of stock directly to ordinary investors through established and vetted peer-to-peer platforms.”[i]

Currently, neither The Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act, HR 2930 nor the Democratizing Access to Capital Act of 2011, S 1791, has been enacted.  Since its passage; however, an ‘order to desist and refrain’ was recently issued in California, which means until states determine how this bill will be implemented, we see push back.

“Elected officials and business leaders – including the financial services industry – need to think seriously about advancing initiatives and policy solutions that address the challenges of entrepreneurs. If we are serious about accelerating economic growth and job creation, new businesses and entrepreneurs must be our focus.”[ii]

“Entrepreneurs in many countries have been soliciting investment through “crowd funding” websites designed specifically for fundraising purposes. But, in the U.S., only wealthy accredited investors have been allowed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to invest in entrepreneurs and their startup companies (without extensive disclosure of the business plan and risks inherent to such new ventures). Those U.S. residents who do not meet accredited standards have been precluded from investing in startup companies.”[iii]

The Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act is one advancing initiative which has the potential to facilitate the acceleration of growth and job creation.   The benefits seem obvious, small start-ups have access to capital.  However, some see if the bill is enacted and implemented, we will see angel investing diminish.   Is this good or bad news? Many see Angel investing as an insulated community where deals are made between individuals and ‘group think’ is a serious byproduct.  Whereas others believe, the bill will open the flood gates for smaller, individual, investors who wish to invest in ventures which share their personal and professional values.  Many are interested in social projects where the business model is based on a social mission.

Internet and social networking platforms like Kickstarter.com are raising the stakes by providing transparent, efficient and reliable methods of transactions.  Traditionally angel investments are done by a handful of wealthy individuals, whereas, with crowd-funding, it potentially can be hundreds of ordinary individuals investing small increments of funding.  Angel investment communities are closed with little transparency; crowd-funding sites provide openness and simplicity.  Investment communities rely on the company.  With crowd-funding the community seeds are what grow the company.

From a business perspective crowd-funding through a social networking site like www.kickstarter.com , “value goes way beyond their stated value proposition of being a new way to fund creative projects. It encourages a deep connection with consumers. In a sense, you are building a street team comprised of all of your project backers prior to product launch. These individuals can then serve as brand ambassadors to help make your newly launched product a success.”[iv]

Why the pushback? The two big objections

  1. Fraud-fear that companies will defraud investors, doesn’t this go on now without crowd-funding?  What we need is more efficiency, transparency and accountability with our investment objectives, goals and interactions. Web, database applications and social networking platforms are providing important methods of documentation, certification and authentication which should minimize the action of fraudulent companies and protect investors.
  2. Angel investor expertise, coaching and networking opportunities are lost or diminished.  We are in the midst of a major paradigm shift in the way we interact and communicate.  Gone are the days of back room deals and handshakes, individuals are craving authenticity and clarity when they are considering investment opportunities in companies.

This is the time for individuals and businesses to embrace change; social technologies which bring groups and communities together to share information educate and teach investment strategies.  Here is another example of how social media and social networking is leveling a playing field.  “The potential is for ordinary people to benefit from investing in the same way that venture capitalists do, but without having to invest large amounts of money. After all, what return have ordinary people been getting recently on their investments or from their deposits?”[v]

 

“Where Social Investors meet Entrepreneurs”

Tonight at the Harvard Peabody Museum local and international philanthropists, work-a-teers, entrepreneurs and social venture capitalists will gather to celebrate generous acts of kindness, charity and Philanthropist.org, an idea in the making, an online exchange that joins charitable donors with volunteers. The inspiration for the “Not-Non-Profit” concept comes from Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust – where he manages the portfolio of stocks, he promotes/recommends/profiles on the TV show .

The same is true for ALL stocks/ventures/businesses listed on philanthropist.org platform – philanthropist.org and associated IP will be fully-owned by a charitable trust – The goal of philanthropist.org  is to leverage the  web/mobile and related technologies to merge into one cloud – This is the space people associate with online giving for all non-profits & NGOs – knowing that there 100% efficiency behind it.

The philanthropist.org organization and those who support it are devoted to the core mission and belief, “everyday people can become philanthropists.” Socially-minded investors can directly and efficiently interface with entrepreneurs and volunteers working on exciting projects around the world by contributing a small loan or donation. Donors use Philanthropist.org because they see value in the ability to easily sort, compare, and select from a wide range of transparent and charitable efforts and efficiently direct their contributions to those individuals deemed most worthy of their philanthropy.

Volunteers, entrepreneurs, and charitable organizations use philanthropist.org to quickly secure funding for their efforts from sympathetic or like-minded donors. Market-based principles and peer-reviewed processes provide required controls, checks and balances allowing people to make informed decisions on all financial contributions.

Philanthropist.org will provide greater impact through maximum efficiency, accountability, and minimal transactional overhead.  Anyone who has the desire to become a philanthropist can make a direct 1-to-1 investment in hardworking people and monitor returns through financial performance and social impact ratings.  A decade ago the idea of such a concept was unheard of.  Now, like minded people who share similar values and beliefs about philanthropy can find ways to collaborate and maximize their charitable acts of giving.  The Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act, passed by Congress last month will no doubt have an impact on “Not non-profit” businesses with a social mission will have an opportunity to raise funds through crowdfunding.  Are you ready?

 

 

Elizabeth Warren speaks to Massachusetts voters

Dec 3, 2011, 11 months before the next Massachusetts US senate election, in 116 homes across the Commonwealth, approximately 2000 people gathered to listen to and learn more about Elizabeth Warren, democratic candidate for United State Senator.  In our home, we had 25 family, friends and neighbors join us for appetizers, pizza, beverages and a discussion of what’s at stake.  We watched several Elizabeth Warren You Tube videos of her life’s work in education, policy and law.  Five people offered to make phone calls and over half pledged to vote for Elizabeth in the next election.

What we learned about Elizabeth
She comes from a humble, hardworking family, her brothers served in the military. She is a wife, mother, grandmother, researcher, teacher, lawyer and bankruptcy expert and policy advocate.  She was a leading force in the establishment of the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) which “is the federal agency that holds primary responsibility for regulating consumer protection in the United States.  She was twice named one of the 100 Most Influential People in the World by Time magazine” [i]

What does Elizabeth stand for?
Middle and work class families have been Elizabeth’s life work.  Her academic research and policy effort led to the idea, an establishment of a first of its kind, consumer protection agency for Americans.  Many political pundits and business leaders called her naive fool hardy; big banks and lobbyist are too powerful to let that happen.  She proved them all wrong and a new institution, the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is in place with their main focus on protecting U.S. consumers.  She stood up to big institution and led a panel examining the federal bailout; she has a reputation as being a ‘watch-dog’ for tax payer dollars.  Time Magazine called her, “new sheriff of Wall St.”

What’s at Stake?
In a CBS poll, the priorities concerning a majority of Americans is the economy, lack of jobs and the growing federal deficit.  In an age of reality TV, information, hyper-connection, mobile technology, we are party to non-stop distraction, divisive sound bites and constant bombardment of division of social and religious issues.   We are witnessing a bread and circus environment, a populace that no longer values civic duty, education, excellence in public service and policy.

The question was asked today on Meet the Press, what can we do to get America back on track?  I guess it depends on the train we decide to take.  We have been off course long before President Obama took the White House.  The 2008 President inherited a world in crisis, the worst economic calamity since the great depression, a raiding of a treasury, billions of dollars lost in the Middle East.  A growing financial deficit, hundreds of thousands of jobs hemorrhaging by the month; an American people suffering two wars, over 5000 killed and more than 30,000 injured.  Inertia greater than ever predicted and a sea of frustration.  At the mantel of democracy he encountered the single most important 2008-2010 initiative, Congress; Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, “the single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.”  We know that since 1986, Republicans have been signing a pact of no new taxes, including keeping the Bush taxes for the 1%, even though many wealthy individuals support the elimination. We know that 95% of all Republican Congressmen and all but one of the 2012 Republican presidential candidates have signed the pledge not to raise taxes under any circumstances. In times like this, we need a rational, educated and pragmatic leader who is willing to collaborate, negotiate and work across the aisle on important issues that are facing Americans.  In Washington, right now we have gridlock.  Rather than finding common ground for what is best for all Americans, our country finds itself in a nightmare reality TV program where ideology and party triumphs prudence and good judgment.  Elizabeth is building a grass roots campaign, listening and learning about what matters most to Massachusetts voters.  Elizabeth embodies authenticity, transparency and accountability, many of the qualities which are missing in our present institutions, public and political leaders.

Why it matters; get involved
As a society we have the potential for national unity; however in order to do so, we must start seeking common ground and similarities.  A love of country and those values we hold near and dear to us can bring people together to discuss important issues which keep us together rather than separate us.  We cannot continue to sustain a future as long as we maintain divisive rhetoric.  Elizabeth Warren, a breath of fresh air, wants to start a grass roots movement so that she can listen to what’s important to the people of Massachusetts.  She is willing to join forces, work together and create common vision for the people of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.  It’s time to get off the side lines and make a choice.  We have a lot at stake.

The Occupy Movement is Making History

Yesterday, a Boston judge gave a two week extension to the City’s petition to evict #Occupy Boston encampment. Occupy Boston members celebrated and talked on Radio Boston, WBUR, about why their case is a symbol of a broader American issue.  The encampment, in it of itself, is a representation of what America stands for: free speech, first amendment and the right of non-violent assembly.  Will the court be able to separate the expression of this movement from the first amendment?  Does it matter if the movement has a single focus to be successful?

The Occupy movement, celebrating a two month birthday, seeks a democratic approach to taking a stand. They are a social generation which believes they can change a system which no longer works for the majority of the American population.  Fueled by the Internet, mobile technology and a social media revolution, they are bringing important social and economic grievances to the streets, parks and social networking sites across the globe. Through collaboration and non-violent civil protest, they are demanding change. Free assembly and demonstration is at the core of the occupation movement and one which is resonating with many Americans.

The movement is becoming a powerful voice which started as a small band marching through the streets; the making of a tent city is what matters most at the moment.  They believe that land and space are important symbols. They are necessary but not core to the movement. Their cohesion is in their ability to communicate across geographic boundaries and reach.  Their Facebook and Twitter feeds are keeping the fabric of a group tied closely by their love and passion of the values and principles which make it an Occupy movement. They see the need to seed the ideas of a movement beyond Wall Street and city parks. Phillip Anderson, an occupy member, would like to bring it into suburbs and living rooms across the country.  Centuries ago, community members sat in living room parlors, where they gathered, to talk and debate important topics of the day on social political, arts and theatre.

The 21st century parlors are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.  We have a generation of socially, economically and political conscious activists, connected, engaged and educated to the important topics of the day.  The Occupy movement just launched a web site www.wecanoccupy.org to engage more people. They are ready to represent the 99%; they want to broaden the message so those who may not make a connection to the movement or the message will agree in principle to support the right of free assembly.

It’s important to think about what an early stage of this movement has done. They are raising the level of America’s consciousness around important disparities. The encampment is a symbol, a participatory playground of democracy; Occupy Boston and the world have volunteers who are vested in the movement.  It may not sustain a long term encampment; it may mean to ask people to go back in history and start hosting events, occupy places and talk about issues close to their values. What are the issues which impact families?   The movement is encouraging discussions of broader concerns. They want people engaged and involved in community activities.  Tim McCarthy, another member wants people to understand that the encampment is just one aspect.  We have people who want to be more political, other’s who want to be more militant; we respect all voices.  At an early phase of movement it is good to diversify strategies, so people can be a part its meaning, value and message.

When we look back at history and read about the civil rights movements, we learn about the bus boycotts, sit in movements and the freedom riders.  These are historical references of good strategies to give people ways to engage in political and social movements.  This group is seeking to diversify and move out to a broader audience to influence ideas, institutions and people.  The criticism of the occupy movement is it doesn’t have a focus.  It’s a matter of debate about what they are protesting; however what we know is that they have the right of freedom of speech.

Does it matter if a movement has a single focus to be successful?  The Occupy Movement may not have one message, but they have brought attention to economic inequality, a financial and political system which is not working for the majority of the population, the 99%.

 

Philanthropy or tax breaks?

What motivates philanthropy in the United States? Can we separate the value of charity without discussing the economy, tax breaks, politics and social responsibility?   In Sunday New York Times article, A Family’s Billions, Artfully Sheltered, Estee Lauder Heir’s Tax Strategies Typify Advantages of the Wealthy,” by David Kocieniewski demonstrates the reason why we need an honest discussion about  the crisis in our social, economic and political system.   Our public leaders and local officials have failed us by not providing a measured and balanced discourse around the pros and cons of an overhaul to our current tax code.

The article gives a glimpse of economic and social disparity. From tax breaks to tax shelters to tax loop holes, protection for the wealthiest Americans  is contributing to the debate waging in Washington and in #Occupy neighborhood parks across the United States. Mr. Lauder, the world’s 362 wealthiest individual has used his influence, wealth and philanthropy . “It is entirely possible that most charitable organizations promote the public good to a sufficient extent to warrant this sort of revenue loss, however it is inaccurate to imply that these contributions are cost less to taxpayers. Everyone else faces a higher tax burden as a result of the tax savings that the wealthy receive from their charitable contributions.”[i]

Several billionaires led by Warren Buffet and Bill Gates have weighed in on the discussion “the current tax code system adds to the budget deficit and contributes to the widening income gap between the richest and the rest of society.”[ii]   Our current tax system allows billionaires like Mr. Lauder to shelter much of their wealth.  For example, one tax shelter allowed Estee Lauder Company to avoid as much as $10 million in federal income tax for years.  In 2014 the company is scheduled to pay taxes on $72 million dollars but as the article reports, many accounting maneuverings will defer the payments.

Another shrewd tactic, used by the wealthy, to prevent paying taxes is called, ‘hedging technique.’  A complicated stock game and “under IRS rules, at the time the Lauder family avoided paying $95 million in capital gains taxes.  This technique was used ‘so aggressively’ by this family that the US Congress amended the law and ultimately, the family paid only a portion of the millions in stock from the ‘hedging technique.’

U.S. tax laws protect the wealthiest U.S. families. At the time of Estee Lauder’s death in 2004 her heirs inherited $4 billion which was taxed at 16%.  In addition, U.S. laws also protect companies’ capital. Case in point, Estee Lauder is worth $600 million; however nearly $400 million is used to secure lines of credit. “It’s a practice which is not generally used by a principal share holder but in this case it’s a way for wealthy stock holders to get cash out without having to pay taxes. Significant portions of Mr. Lauder’s inherited stock are held in family trusts, which reduce the ultimate estate tax.”  [iii]

Mortgage interest deduction is another tax shelter which few average Americans can take advantage.  “Household with more than a $1 million in income claimed more than $27 billion in such deductions from 2006-2009. Some of the wealthiest are also deducting mortgage interest on their yachts.”[iv]. Another little gem of the U.S. tax code is that there is no limit on the amount of property tax that can be deducted.  For one of his many properties, Mr. Lauder pays $400 thousand in property tax each year on his Palm Beach mansion which he can deduct from his taxes.  “This welfare for the well-off costing billions of dollars a year-is being paid for with the taxes of the less fortunate, many of whom are working two jobs just to make ends meet.” [v]

Charity or tax breaks?  This month Mr. Lauder was recognized with the Carnegie Foundations Medal of Philanthropy award for those people who are extremely generous and give generously to charities. What many are not aware of is that art collectors who offer their work to museums up until 2006 were able to take a deduction for donating a portion of their act collection.  “The tax code shouldn’t allow the wealthy the kind of loopholes that let them, essentially, force other tax payers to underwrite donations to their pet causes.” [vi]

Mr. Kocieniewski, NYT article clearly demonstrates a deep social and economic divide which continues to widen as a result of a system in crisis.  Over the weekend, on Meet the Press, Grover Norquist, President, Americans for Tax Reform, praised the no new tax pledge which includes closing tax loop holes for the wealthy. The Bush tax cuts are set to expire at the end of 2012. President Obama advocates to the keep the tax cuts for working and middle class families while letting them run out on the wealthy.

Sixty minutes showed children who are living in cars in the streets, not far from the mansions in Florida. The economic divide creates Invisible People, those who are not as lucky as Mr. Lauder to be born into wealth and privilege. These are the people who are born into generations of laborers, working class who have lost their jobs, homes and the American dream.  They have slipped below the radar screen; they are now one of the 49.1 million Americans living in poverty.

As the Republican debates continue, a pledge led by Mr. Norquist which is supported by the majority of Republicans refuses to budge on reviewing the current tax code.  Yet, elimination and deep cuts are on the table for current entitlements programs for the elderly (social security payments and Medicare) the poor, (Medicaid, welfare and food stamps) and the military (military aid). Many Americans are questioning how paying into social security, unemployment benefits and serving in the military are considered entitlements. Republicans are protesting big government and purging departments such as education, energy and commerce.

What is the social and moral responsibility of a society to care for its people, young, old and infirmed?  Political leaders are able to advocate cuts in economic, education and social programs for the poor while standing up for the wealthy.  They are preventing a portion of the population from paying their fair share at the expense of working and middle class families. How we justify a system which has cut the taxes of the very wealthy (In 1957, tax rate for top earners was 90%, in 1978 tax rate for top earners was 70%, today top earners tax rate is 35%)?  Americans have a choice- do we continue tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans on the backs of working and middle class families? Or do we demand a reasonable, rational approach to the tax code?


[i] Inspired? Read more:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/beat_the_press/~3/9keQXESN1dw/the-philanthropy-of-the-rich-does-have-a-cost-to-taxpayers#ixzz1f0X3NaAj

[ii] http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/27/business/estee-lauder-heirs-tax-strategies-typify-advantages-for-wealthy.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=A%20Family%27s%20Billions,%20Artfully%20sheltered&st=cse

[iii] http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/27/business/estee-lauder-heirs-tax-strategies-typify-advantages-for-wealthy.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=A%20Family%27s%20Billions,%20Artfully%20sheltered&st=cse

[iv] [iv] http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/27/business/estee-lauder-heirs-tax-strategies-typify-advantages-for-wealthy.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=A%20Family%27s%20Billions,%20Artfully%20sheltered&st=cse

[v] [v] http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/27/business/estee-lauder-heirs-tax-strategies-typify-advantages-for-wealthy.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=A%20Family%27s%20Billions,%20Artfully%20sheltered&st=cse

[vi] [vi] http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/27/business/estee-lauder-heirs-tax-strategies-typify-advantages-for-wealthy.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=A%20Family%27s%20Billions,%20Artfully%20sheltered&st=cse

 

The Business Incubator Center

The Business Incubator Center is calling out for candidates to apply for their Internationally Recognized Incubator Program. Start-ups are a vital contributor to the health and diversity of our local economy.  The Business Incubator Center was one of several initiatives created to diversify the economy and create jobs. The Business Incubator Center has a variety of different programs to help entrepreneurs. They offer an intensive 5-year business support program that accelerates the successful development of start-up and fledgling companies by providing entrepreneurs with an array of targeted resources and services.

Participants in the Incubator Program will receive regular formal financial reviews, on-going management guidance, technical assistance, business consulting, assistance in obtaining the financing necessary for company growth, and networking opportunities with other businesses & customers in the community. Other services offered are:

  • Training Classes – Offered through the Small Business Development Center, classes cover such topics as marketing, taxes, bookkeeping & financial statements, and the in depth Leading Edge program. These are often available at a reduced rate to Incubator Program Companies.
  • Intensive Projects – From time to time, Program Companies have intensive projects with which they need assistance. This may involve the use of interns or other specialists brought in for that purpose.
  • Trade Shows and Showcases – Through the Incubator program, Program Companies have the opportunity to participate in trade shows and business showcases, often free of charge.
  • Open Houses and Socials – Many are offered throughout the year, including an annual holiday open house. Program Companies are encouraged to participate, as these are excellent networking opportunities.

Today, the Incubator Program serves approximately 54 Incubator Program Companies in our 60,000 square foot facilities. The Business Incubator Center is nationally recognized as a leader in entrepreneurial business support. During its 23 year history, it’s been recognized with five National Business Incubation Association (NBIA) awards for its programs, clients and graduates’ performance.

The Incubator Program has some openings and is looking for candidates to apply to be in the Incubator Program. Interested applicants can download the application for the program off the website www.gjincubator.org or by coming to the Business Incubator Center in Colorado. All types of businesses within different industries should apply, including manufacturing, agriculture, professional & technical services, construction and retail.

Resources are available, you just have to reach out to it.

American Airlines went Bankrupted

The parent company for American Airlines, the nation’s third largest carrier, filed for bankruptcy due to high labor and fuel costs and operating in a volatile economy.

American was the world’s biggest airline as recently as 2008, but has fallen behind United and Delta after those two companies bought other airlines. Hopefully filing for bankruptcy will actually allow them to significantly restructure debts and refine labor contracts to achieve better numbers.

It was reported that booked flights are secure, as American said it would operate its regular schedule and honor tickets and reservations. But American could reduce its number of flights and that could mean that not all routes would continue indefinitely. This can be a problem for frequent fliers who own thousands and millions worth of points because what is the point if AA cannot provide the routes fliers need or want to travel on. With American Airlines filing for bankruptcy, does this also mark the end of cheap air travel?

Crowding funding gathers bipartisan support

November was the month the super committee would tackle the debt crisis; they were to do what the US Congress could not: bipartisan support to establish reasonable and rational alternatives to the growing deficit. They too failed. Yet, during the same time, one bill, the Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act was passed by a 407-17 vote, with 9 abstentions. One of the requirements of the new bill states that businesses can secure no more than 2 million dollars per venture and individual investors are able to invest up to 10% of their portfolio or $10,000 per year.  NPR radio reported after the passing of the bill, at the victory party constituents joked the bill should be renamed the Obama McHenry friend ship bill. The principle is to eliminate regulation, to free up capital for small businesses using crowd-funding, a way to raise small sums of money over the internet from large groups of people.

The Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act amends a 1933 securities rule which prevents securities exchange across interstate and U.S. mail.  One entrepreneur who in 2009 launched a pro-crowd- funding organization supported the bill’s passage.  The bill will facilitate market inefficiency and provide opportunities for online communities and affinity groups to support local and global business ventures.  Crowd-funding can help raise capital and dreams for small business owners.  One example was a laid off construction worker who two years ago took his mother’s recipes and turned it into a taco joint on wheels.  When a neighbor invested $25,000 in a dream, one year later, he owns two trucks with 33 employees.  The business owner also sees the value in employing a social media strategy, building a community and giving back. He tweets daily specials and engages with over 6000 followers and 1300 Instant Message users.  His followers are a generation of fans who support him and are willing to invest in his company.

As great as it sounds, some believe con-artist will take advantage of the new law and web sites will start to spring up promising quick deals which close up as soon as they receive the money.  No question this is a risky venture.  However many social entrepreneurs, venture capitalists and social investors have been waiting to leverage social networking and crowd-funding sites to support their mission driven businesses.   With the proliferation of mobile technology and applications, people are merging their offline experiences with online engagement.  Many are able to share their interactions in real time with friends and family.

The passage of the Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act also reflects a colliding of two worlds; the physical with the digital.  Individuals from their phones and mobile devices can now search, view projects and businesses which share their core values, principles and purpose and invest in them. They can share it with their social and professional networks and ask for their help.

Maybe we can start a new trend in access to capital by sponsoring a social venture entrepreneurship day which eclipses sales of Cyber Monday and Black Friday.  What if one day a year we go online to raise money for local food pantries in communities across the U.S. which need them the most?  This can now happen as a result of the Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act allowing people to invest small sums of money to mission driven ventures which have lasting social impact in local communities.

http://www.npr.org/2011/11/27/142821690/the-deregulation-bill-thats-drawing-crowds

http://jimhamiltonblog.blogspot.com/2011/11/house-floor-colloquies-define-key-terms.html

 

 

 

Sweet Dreams in Philanthropy

Each week, we look for inspirational stories which promote social entrepreneurship, giving back to communities and fostering philanthropy throughout the world.  May this story bring a smile to your face. Two social entrepreneurs, Alexis Miesen and Jennie Dundas, envisioned “eventually” starting a non-profit in line with their general business mission of “being good for the community, near and far.” Two business woman who own, Blue Marble, an eco-conscious, organic ice cream boutique in a neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York City, had a vision for a self-sustaining business which is able to spread to communities across the globe.

The idea was, “ bring an ice cream parlor to a community anywhere in the world where people can come together in a neutral space and have an informal conversation,” “Informality creates the ties and networks of communities that Rwanda so desperately needs to create.”   These are the types of stories that leave a warm feeling in your heart and a smile on your face.  Even in dark times, a bright light, a beacon of hope, love and generosity finds its way into a community.

Inspired? Read more:  http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1997330,00.html

Small businesses need social media to succeed in the 21st century

Seventy-three percent of 343 small business owners surveyed, report using social media for personal use; however few use it for their business.  What prevents business owners from using social media in their industry to connect, engage and listen to their customers?

51% fear sharing sensitive information
44% fear ‘information overload’
67% hold back investing in social media because they don’t know where to begin
50% too much information to manage

Today, savvy consumers are seeking businesses which not only have a social media presence but are willing to engage with them, provide incentives to frequent their venue(s) and reward them for bringing new customers. The convergence of the Internet, a content driven engine, social media, platforms which connect people is uniting the virtual world with bricks and mortar establishments.  Mobile technology and location-based applications are the driving force behind a generation which uses smart phones to connect and engage with family, friends, companies and brands.  Social media provides small businesses an opportunity to reward loyal customers while making new ones. Customer expectations and the social component of social media are shaking up traditional business models.

What makes social media so powerful? Social media core principle and set of values: authenticity, transparency and accountability, is about doing well while building relationships, providing value and giving people reason to engage with you and purchase from you. Social media demands legitimacy, truth and genuineness.  The very nature of social engagement requires transparency and accountability. It’s about being authentic, building a community, connecting, engaging, helping, asking and giving. People want to know you, like you and engage with you before they are willing to purchase from you, especially over the Internet.

It’s only a matter of time that those businesses which neglect to claim their venue(s) and engage with their customers over the Internet and social media sites will not exist. Small business owners who do not embrace the technology are missing out on opportunities to listen and respond to potential customers who have the power of word of mouth and willing to share it with a thousand of their closest friends.  Those businesses which use social media solely to sell and market are missing the point.

Bricks and mortar businesses which value the principles of social media, tap into their business community, listen to market influencers and respond by providing incentives to draw customers in to shop and rewards loyal customers will benefit from designing and implementing a social media strategy.

Consider the value you bring to the community and create specific messages to convey it to your audience. Generate a list of key words and statements which illuminate the values of your business.  Next create a virtual shingle so that customers can easily search and find your business.  Identify and optimize your digital foot print by claiming your business on the Internet and social networking sites such as Google, Yelp, and Trip Advisor. Make sure to invest in a blog and social media channels, such as Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and YouTube.

Once business accounts are claimed, connect them to your business web site.  Make sure to state the ‘call to action.’  Join our mailing list; follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook to receive updates and loyalty discounts.  One example of a successful social media story includes a local bakery, Bread and Roses Bakery, in Ogunquit Maine.  After establishing the social media channels for the bakery, an announcement was sent to their customers to let them know that Bread and Roses was going social.  Bread and Roses customers in a newsletter were asked to:

1.       Like Bread and Rose’s website and FB business page.

2.       Join Bread and Roses email list, and follow the bakery’s blog.

3.       Use Twitter and YouTube to take advantage of the bakery’s online presence.

4.       Follow the specials, bakery products and the happenings in the kitchen and store.

5.      Check-in using Yelp, Facebook or Foursquare receive 10% off any purchase.

6.       Write a review on Yelp and or Trip Advisor.

7.       Posts updates, pictures and videos of customer testimonials in the store on to the bakery’s Facebook, You Tube and Twitter to generate buzz and word of mouth.

The results were positive!


A little bakery in Southern Maine claimed their business on social media and began an engagement campaign letting their loyal followers know that they took a leap of faith and established a virtual presence.

 

What they did not expect was the overwhelming support of their seasonal and loyal customers.

One surprising result, a group of customers, who usually frequent a competitor down the road, saw Bread and Roses social media specials, each time they checked-in via Foursquare, Facebook or Yelp; they received 10% off their purchase.  For the remainder of the season, those customers frequented her establishment daily which translated into an overall increase in her revenue from the previous year.  This new business was a direct result of her social media engagement and campaign(s). Bread and Roses Bakery owner, Mary Breen, embraced the underlining principles of social media, do well, give back. She insists that the buzz in the bakery spilled over onto her social media sites.  She said she sold more pies this Thanksgiving than any other year, a total of 375.

Visit Bread and Roses Bakery YouTube channel to listen to happy customers from all over the world who frequent a seasonal bakery.

Crowd-funding levels the investment playing field

Since 2010, this blogger has written about social media: the good, the bad and the ugly.  We are in the midst of one of the biggest revolts since the industrial revolution; social media has leveled the political, cultural, social and financial playing fields.  This month with the with the passage of the “Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act,” capital investment, once a bastion for small groups of wealthy capitalists, protected by 1930’s laws, investing in the next big venture, is now open to all investors.

Investing, make no mistake about it, includes immense risk especially if you are new to individual online investing.  Crowd-sourcing and crowd-funding provides savvy investors the ability to search the Internet, look for businesses, start-ups and projects to invest in or donate to.  In some cases investors can track, monitor and measure the progress of their investment.  Social businesses and social entrepreneurs who have mission driven businesses have been waiting for the passage of this bill so that they too can now leverage crowd-sourcing for crowd-funding to raise capital. This bodes well for the rest of us too.

The bill’s benefits:

  1. Companies and businesses have access to social business sites which seek investment for new inventions, development, software application, manufacturing, hiring and selling new products and services. Small businesses which have great ideas or are focused on solving a social or economic problem while making a profit can now pitch it to a wider-audience using crowd-funding. Businesses which have been shut out of traditional funding have over 13 social networking, crowd-funding, companies which promise to connect entrepreneurs with investors.  In addition, “Start-ups which are especially needy now, since many banks are loath to lend even to well-established companies. Optimists, including the White House, which supports the bill, say that if small businesses get better access to funding they can help create jobs. Start-ups in America already add around 3m jobs a year, according to the Kauffman Foundation, a think-tank.” http://www.economist.com/node/21538770?fsrc=scn/tw/te/ar/manyscrappyreturns
  2. Investors who do their due diligence to protect their investment with research and information have an opportunity to connect with companies which resonate with their own core values and make an investment or donation to that company. More people are taking and making their choices and decisions online.  In principal, social networking and cause-based social platforms bring like-minded individuals who share similar business principles together to collaborate, raise money which in some cases help communities while making profits.
  3. Society as more businesses solicit, attract and transact with investors through social networking sites, it becomes increasingly more important for a level of transparency and accountability to prevent fraud and abuse.  Does today’s technology address and put in place measures to prevent Internet fraud and investment scams? Will they be implemented?   “The current bill does not require start-ups to give detailed information about their business plan, and since stakes in businesses are il-liquid, investors will not be able easily to get their cash back.”  http://www.economist.com/node/21538770?fsrc=scn/tw/te/ar/manyscrappyreturns  An authentication and verification system which identifies and verifies the authenticity of the business and individuals must be built into a system which offers these services.
  4. Government- the new law amends outdated 1933 Security Exchange Commission regulations to reflect the information, computer and digital age.  Social networking platforms are transforming the way we conduct business, interact with family and friends, book travel and entertainment. It is only natural for the laws to support and protect this new way of conducting e-commerce.   In addition, the federal government is taking notice and beginning to leverage the power of crowd-sourcing through www.challenge.gov. The government is providing the power of social networking and social media to make real change in communities across the country.

Here are a few companies and web sites which will influence the crowd-funding space and passing of the “Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act:

Philanthropist.org Compete to give. Everyday people become philanthropists. As a donor or socially-minded investor, you can directly and efficiently interface with entrepreneurs and volunteers working on exciting projects around the world by contributing a small loan or donation. With philanthropist.org you will provide greater impact through maximum efficiency, accountability, and minimal transactional overhead. You become a philanthropist by making direct 1-to-1 investments in hardworking people and monitoring your returns through financial performance and social impact ratings
Kickstarter.com

 

Kickstarter projects must be fully funded before funding time expires or no money changes hands. Project creators are required to offer rewards — products, benefits, and experiences — to project backers. Integrates with Facebook, Twitter, and offers a widget for your website. Kickstarter charges a 5 percent fee, in addition to third party processing fees
33needs Promoting business-led solutions to our world’s biggest needs, it provides crowdfunding for social entrepreneurs, social enterprises and companies with a social mission.
Peerbackers  It is an online funding platform that allows business owners to raise capital from their “peers”—in small increments—in exchange for tangible rewards to those who contribute.
Indiegogo Our mission is to enable anyone in the world to raise more money, from more people, faster. We provide a platform that provides anybody with an idea (creative, cause-related, or entrepreneurial) the opportunity to create a funding campaign, offer perks to their contributors, and ultimately get their idea funded.

 

References:
http://www.businessinsider.com/if-this-bill-passes-the-angel-investment-community-is-dead-and-companies-like-kickstarter-take-over-2011-11
http://www.economist.com/node/21538770?fsrc=scn/tw/te/ar/manyscrappyreturns
http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2011/11/04/is-crowd-funding-coming-to-a-small-business-near-you/
http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/2853-13-Crowdfunding-Websites-to-Fund-Your-Business

Philanthropist Weekly: Super Committee Super Failure

We need to occupy judgment, values and leadership.  Here we are with super gridlock in Congress and once again the American people are left hanging in the balance by silent hallways and utter silence from the super committee.  Democrats and Republicans were charged with reducing the deficit; it was an opportunity to show the American people that twelve people can come together to do the difficult work which could not be done by the entire Congress.  The New York Times reports today that the committee rarely met, they failed us. As of today, the United State is vulnerable to yet another down-grading of its credit rating.

When George Bush first took office his administration was handed a sizeable surplus. When Barak Obama took office in 2008, he was handed record debt, a financial system was in shambles, the auto-industry on the brink of failure, the banks and institutions which were too big to fail, were on the verge of collapsing; the American people were forced to bail them out.  Add insult to injury, at the end of the run, banking, finance and Wall Street executives reaped millions in bonuses while families across the country were thrown out of their homes and onto the streets.

In 2008, not long after the election, the American people were told by the Republican leadership that although 50% of the American people voted for the president, they would do everything in their political and personal power to make sure he was a onetime President.  With the election less than one year away, they may finally succeed in the one promise that they made, making sure a president fails at the expense of its people. No wonder working and middle class families lost ground; we were hit with a recession, lost jobs, had zero growth of income, while we witnessed congress and political leaders play tag with our global standing in the world, our economic, social and political futures.

What happened to judgment, the evaluation of evidence in making a decision?  Did our leaders not see the implications in their lack of action and its impact on the American people they serve?  We vote people into office who we believe exercise good judgment and decision making.  What we neglect to realize is that judgment is based on personal values, aligned with a belief system.  We have a great many leaders whose personal belief system is wrapped up in their financial gain and political power.

What are the operating principles which govern our leaders?  Why are their values so fundamentally different than the average American?  What allows them to live with one set of rules while the rest of Americans endure hardship?  Our parents and grandparents who gave so much to this country are now sitting on an economic time bomb; Medicare and Medicaid are under siege, social security is next.  We expect our leaders to guide us out of the economic abyss and towards some form of reconciliation. However, promises have been made, brokered and broken. We have 49.1 million Americans who live below the poverty level; while we have 1% of the population whose net worth is equal to that of the bottom 50 million Americans.  In the halls of Congress we have silence.

Crowd-funding a viable option for small businesses

Back in September in 2011, two marketing executives from Pabst Brewing Company raised close to $200 million dollars in online donations with an average of $40 per donation before the SEC closed down the operation for breaking SEC rules. The online campaign, www.BuyaBeerCompany.com sparked national concern and debate over the obscure SEC laws preventing the raising of capital over the Internet.  The pass of the Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act changes the rules which date back to 1933.

The two executives leveraged, crowd-sourcing, the power of the masses whereby individuals easily connect and join like-minded affinity groups, unencumbered by geographic boundaries to tackle  projects, programs and missions. Crowd-funding leverages the concept of crowd-sourcing soliciting large numbers of people to support, help or donate to a particular venture, task or charge.

Up until the passage of The Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act, crowd-funding was exclusively used to fund raise for non-profit organizations.  With the passage of the act, small businesses have the ability to use the same methods to solicit capital online. If you are a small business owner looking for investment capital to jump start a new business, project or a social mission, you may want to learn more about crowd-funding.  To truly understand and appreciate crowd-funding, one needs to know about the power of crowd-sourcing which facilitates large groups of people to assist on projects requiring more than a single person to accomplish it.

The influence and reach of the Internet, social networking and social media core values: authenticity, transparency and accountability; crowd-sourcing has real value and credibility.  Crowd-sourcing is divided into four distinct groups.  Business and social sites provide technology infrastructure which allow communities of practice to populate information, raise awareness and funds to impact industries and communities. (http://dailycrowdsource.com/downloads/umbrella-of-crowdsourcing.pdf):

  1. Micro task-divide a large project into smaller tasks to be dispersed to several people. Examples of projects include, research, data confirmation, data tagging-http://www.clickworker.com/en .
  2. Macro task-demonstrating the requirements necessary for project completion and asking those knowledgeable in the areas if they can assist.
  3. Crowd-funding-requesting support or donation of money from a group of people for a particular project or cause. In most cases if donations goals are not met the money can be refunded.   http://www.kickstarter.com/
  4. Contests-ask a large group to participate; only a few are chosen or compensated http://www.squadhelp.com/ http://www.crowdspring.com/.

The pressures and threats with limited capital sources, the growth of global innovation and the ability of other countries, France, Denmark and the United Kingdom to implement crowd-funding led to the passing and overhaul the SEC laws.  The vetting of worthy businesses will take place, “if changes are made in U.S. laws, the funding rounds can occur via SEC-regulated websites. These websites will provide transparency, open communication, accountability and reporting among the investors, entrepreneurs and the SEC. This is an expanded version of “friends and family” fundraising, which uses an individual’s or business owner’s social networks to create jobs and grow the economy.”

Small businesses which use the Internet and social networking sites to engage with their audience and investors have a much better chance of raising capital using crowd-funding.  Businesses which tap into their community will drive their vision and mission.

http://dailycrowdsource.com/2011/10/24/earth/geography/new-crowdfunding-company-links-start-ups-with-investors/

 

My love- hate relationship with Four Square

Over the last year, I have used Foursquare both, as a consumer and as a business to help my clients establish their venue and run campaigns to drive new business and reward loyal customers.  The concept is Foursquare is a location based function which can be down loaded on your smart-phone.  When consumers check in using Foursquare , it provides a list of the businesses in the area.  In some cases the business has a little orange Special icon.  When one clicks it on, it unlocks a special.simple; however for businesses the execution is not.  There lies my ambivalence with this company and their application.

For example, while at a mall or in center of a town, one can take out their smart phone check in using Foursquare and receive a list of businesses in the area.  A local bakery is offering a free cinnamon twist as a first time check-in.   One can go into the bakery, check-in and show the person behind the counter the unlocked special on the phone and receive a free cinnamon twist.  A savvy business owner sets their cash register to reflect social media discounts and what else is being purchased with the special.  This way they can monetize the investment of ‘giving  away’ or discounting  items.  We believe that smart business owners who reward faithful clientele will create a community of fans who keep returning with friends and family.

Here’s where it gets interesting.  In real time, the person who just received the free cinnamon twist at the bakery can let friends know on Facebook and Twitter they are at the bakery,  received a  free cinnamon twist, if friends are in the area, they can join in on the special.  However, if they have checked in before they will not receive the cinnamon twist free, but after a third check-in they may receive 20% off a $10 or more purchase. Businesses which have a physical venue are able to claim their establishment on Foursquare and begin to offer a series of specials to give incentives for customers to shop at their venue.

Getting back to the bakery example, the owner of the bakery can also log into Four square where they interact with a business dashboard which displays information about customers. Foursquare displays the total number of people who have check-in, the % of male, female users, their social reach on Twitter, Facebook, the number of times they have come to your store.   Business owners who implement a loyalty program can integrate and attach the sales to the customer.  Next time the person checks in to the neighborhood, the bakery can send a directed message to the customer saying, “we see you are in the neighborhood, stop by and receive 10% off your next purchase.

Foursquare brings venues, friends, family together, rewarding new and loyal customers.  The problem with the process is as a small business owner who works with other small business owners on their digital presence and brand, Foursquare makes it next to impossible for business owners to easily claim their venue.

Foursquare to be a viable business must figure out another method for claiming business.  Right now, the process appears to be seamless until you actually use Foursquare to locate the business and try to claim it.  Two ways to claim the business either by phone or U.S postal, which means if the phone number does not register with Foursquare, for whatever reason, you now have to wait for snail mail to deliver your confirmation number.  No specials or engagement until you can unlock your business.   For a consultant who goes into the businesses to set them up, it’s a night mare!  Many business owners do not have the time to learn or engage with the technology.  The value that my business adds to their existing business is the ability to digitally brand their business, tie it to a location based application like Foursquare to drive new business and returning customers.   The window of opportunity to convince business owners to claim their venue is short, when the system doesn’t work, it closes immediately!  In some cases, it impacts their overall decision to go social and implement social networking tools.

Over the course of the last week, this consultant went to five venues and was only able to claim one.  Two out of the five phone numbers, although registered as the official business phone number on Google and in the phone book, Foursquare did not accept it.  In one venue the phone actually rang, but did not give the code; it stated there was a problem but did not elaborate.  As a veteran technology consultant this experience is unacceptable and gives not only consultants a bad image, it doesn’t do anything for integrating technology into bricks and mortar, it also does not bode well for Foursquare.

After sending and receiving email back and forth, unable to talk to a person in real time, a week later I am still unable to claim two businesses. Foursquare, you need to rethink your business model; right now you have lots of customers checking in, yet  few businesses are engaging with them!

Social media impacts investing: crowd-funding helps small business

With the passage of new legislation, generating capital for start-ups and new business, more opportunities exist now than ever before for small business to seek out investors who are willing to invest in their venture(s). Crowd-funding allows business, entrepreneurs and start-ups to receive small-dollar financial backing for projects from large numbers of donors.

The influence of the Internet, e-commerce, social media and social networking cannot be overstated in the influence to modify 1933 security and exchange laws. The social media revolution which has its own set of values: authenticity, transparency and accountability are influencing all aspects of our society and culture.

We cannot lose site of the fact that the Internet and social networking brings like-minded people together to communicate, educate, entertain one another can now take their collective dollars and invest in companies which align with their core values and financial goals.   We are on the verge of revolutionizing traditional investment interaction. Non-wealthy, non-professional investors for the first time can search the Internet research public offerings of business ventures and decide if they want to invest.

Traditionally, legal barriers and complex set of regulations prevented small non-professional investors from entering the world of venture investments; however, under the new law, crowd-funding has opened the door for new capital from large audiences with small donations.

What does this mean for the small start-up which is on the verge of a new business opportunity but cannot receive traditional bank loans, or have a seat at the venture capital table?  It means they can take their business model to the Internet, describe business goals, demonstrate the value it brings to the market place and seek thousands if not tens of thousands of people soliciting $5, $10 $100 investments.

What does this mean for the non-professional investor? Individual investors can now invest in companies up to 10% of their overall portfolio.  It also means that the average investor has control over the types of investments they wish to invest in.   Socially and economically conscious individuals can now seek investment opportunities in organizations and companies in which share their values, ideologies and goals; business can make profits while creating positive change in the world. The proliferation of social sites also provides transparency, accountability and oversight for individual investor.  However, let’s not lose sight of the fact that with any new legislation there is concern to protect citizens from being manipulated, cheated and swindled out of hard earned dollars.

As we move in the direction of crowd-funding, the role and responsibility of the individual becomes increasingly important.  Individual investors need to become much more educated and aware of where their investment dollars are going.  Savvy Internet and social networking users have more financial investment opportunity, the question is can they take that knowledge and become savvy Internet investors?

Crowd-funding, good news for social entrepreneurs

On Capitol Hill this week with overwhelming bi partisan support (407-17 vote,) the Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act was passed. The convergence of innovation, social media, social entrepreneurship and the power of individual investing came together. Crowd-funding, which allows business, social entrepreneurs and start-ups to receive small-dollar financial backing for projects from large numbers of donors.  “In short, the bill allows entrepreneurs to finance startups and small businesses by crowd funding — bankrolling their activities by soliciting donations through online sources without having to comply with many federal restrictions or register with the Securities and Exchange Commission.”
http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/2011/11/14/bill_open_door_to_crowdfunding.html

The bill exempts securities from registration requirements if the cumulative amount raised through the issuance is $1 million or less.  Each year ($2 million or less if the issuer provides investors with certain financial information;) and each individual who invests in the securities does not invest, in any year, more than the lesser of $10,000 or 10 percent of the investor’s annual income. http://www.gop.gov/bill/112/1/hr2930. What does this mean for crowd-funding, social entrepreneurship and venture philanthropy? We start by gaining an understanding of the terms and their meaning.

Crowd-funding http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowdfunding , (sometimes called crowd financingcrowd sourced capital, or street performer protocol) describes the collective cooperation, attention and trust by people who network and pool their money and other resources together, usually via the Internet, to support efforts initiated by other people or organizations. Crowd funding occurs for any variety of purposes[1], from disaster relief to citizen journalism to artists seeking support from fans, to political campaigns, to funding a startup company or small business[2] or creating free software.”

Social entrepreneurship http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_entrepreneurship “is the work of social entrepreneurs which recognize a social problem and uses entrepreneurial principles to organize, create and manage a venture to achieve social change (a social venture.) While a business entrepreneur typically measures performance in profit and return, a social entrepreneur focuses on creating social capital. Thus, the main aim of social entrepreneurship is to further social and environmental goals. Social entrepreneurs are most commonly associated with the voluntary and not-for-profit sectors,[1]but this need not preclude making a profit. Social entrepreneurship practices a world view or international context is called international social entrepreneurship.[2]

Venture philanthropy “takes concepts and techniques from venture capital finance and technology, management and applies it to philanthropic endeavors.”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venture_philanthropy

Micro-financing http://www.philanthropist.org/microfinance.php “is a method of providing financial services to low-income entrepreneurs, often in the developing world. The provision of small loans to these individuals is called microcredit. Traditional banking services and loans are usually not a viable option for these potential borrowers because they often do not have assets that can be used as collateral and smaller loans are simply not profitable for the banks to maintain.”

Why the Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act is important
The failing economy is one of the driving forces behind the bi-partisan support. However, the Internet, social media and social networking sites are making it much easier for the average individual investor to invest capital in like-minded companies and social ventures without the red-tape, scrutiny or restrictions of the Federal Trade Commission.

Government and business leaders agree with a faltering economy, non-traditional methods of investment capital and job creation is necessary.  At the same time, social media’s reach and influence makes e-fundraising and e-venture philanthropy a logical next step.  The passage of the bill will open capital to businesses which are unable to secure  traditional bank loans. In many cases it will keep companies and missions viable and growing. However, concern exists over inexperienced investors losing money in high risk ventures and gambles.  Protective measures to guard the public from securities fraud must be part of the amended act.  For example will states have the authority and regulatory power over companies which participate in crowd-funding?  People who have been convicted of securities crimes, how will they be restricted from crowd-funding? A disclosure on company web sites and social networking channels is required stating the risk and speculative nature of investment start-ups. Is this enough?

Who benefits from the passing of the Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act?
Michael Barnard commented on a blog about what it means to one industry. “The independent film industry has been adversely affected by the economy and technology, more than many other industries. One symptom of this malaise is the rise of “crowd-funding,” the only way many filmmakers have been able to practice their art and craft. We connect with people via crowd-funding who are willing to donate money in order to see independent films continue. It is not a profitable venture for any involved and the amounts are small. Because of the hindrances of the broad securities regulations, crowd-funding has been only a vehicle for small donations, not large investment. This has kept the independent film industry expressive, but in turmoil and without any financial base for rebuilding its infrastructure. This is an exciting opportunity for filmmakers to offer real equity investment to those who are interested in independent films. These people want to participate in filmmaking and are knowledgeable about its risks and rewards.” http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_2930.html#usercomments

www.kickstarter.com is an example of crowd-funding which allows actors, artists and entertainers to solicit fans to raise funds for their projects and entertainment tours and in return, participants receive CD’s T-shirts and signed posters.  Crowd-funding will also allow startups to offer and sell securities via crowd-funding sites and social networks. http://www.portfolio.com/business-news/2011/11/03/house-passes-two-bills-to-help-startups-raise-capital

www.philanthropist.org will benefit from the passing of the act. This social venture is an example of seven successful social and business entrepreneurs who have a business vision with a social mission. They have created a global network of like-minded people who are leveraging technical, financial and business principles to bring people of means with people in need. The ultimate goal is to eradicate poverty in the developing world. What makes it truly innovative is that “Philanthropist.org is a virtual community which allows exchanges that join charitable donors with volunteers. Donors use Philanthropist.org because they see value in the ability to easily sort, compare, and select from a wide range of transparent and charitable efforts and efficiently direct their contributions to those individuals deemed most worthy of their philanthropy.”

The passing of this bill allows www.philanthropist.org to further the mission by allowing individuals to become Internet philanthropists. They have a viable technology infrastructure driven by a business model which includes five guiding principles: transparency, inclusion, liberty, efficiency and social impact http://www.philanthropist.org/mission.php. This one organization has the potential to leverage crowd-funding and social entrepreneurship.

Time will tell if the passing of this bill creates better access to new capital, expands new businesses and creates new job opportunities.  The crowd-funding exemption is a big boom for a lot of American small business owners who are looking for new and innovative ways to establish business capital and spurn new ventures. Others are skeptical.  We will be watching. http://www.nhbr.com/businessnewsstatenews/939487-257/crowdfunding-gets-big-boost-in-congress.html

 

Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act – H.R. 2930 – Executive Summary

The legislation would amend the Securities Act of 1933 to establish an exemption from the requirement that certain securities be registered with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). Specifically, the bill would exempt securities from registration requirements if:

The aggregate amount raised through the issuance is $1 million or less each year ($2 million or less if the issuer provides investors with certain financial information); and
Each individual who invests in the securities does not invest, in any year, more than the lesser of $10,000 or 10 percent of the investor’s annual income.
In order to qualify for this exemption, the bill would also require issuers or intermediaries acting between issuers and investors to provide certain information and risk disclosures to investors, such as warnings of the speculative nature generally applicable to investments in startups, emerging businesses, and small issuers. The bill would also require issuers or intermediaries to provide information about the issuer and offering to the SEC, in addition to providing continuous investor-level access to the intermediary’s website and maintaining such books and records as the SEC deems appropriate.

Additionally, the bill would require the SEC to develop regulations to implement this new authority and to set out actions that would disqualify certain individuals from issuing securities under the exemption.

Philanthropist.Org Weekly Watch

Newspaper leader sees a world without print

In this week’s New York Times article, “Newspapers’ Digital Apostle, Chief of 2 Chains Prepares for World Without Print,” reports how one news paper executive is embracing the digital world.  John Paton, Media News chief executive is banking on the social media revolution which is transforming all aspects of our social, political and economic world.  He sees the future and believes, “at some point, print is going to cost more money than it is worth.  If you don’t have a viable business model to turn it off when that day comes, where does that leave you?”

This weekend, we listened to a group of small business owners lament about the in ability to monetize social media marketing and advertising.  It’s no different than print advertising.  However what traditional business is missing is that it’s not just about marketing and advertising, it’s a shift in ideology and philosophy of a social media generation.  The social media culture is about doing well financially while doing well socially by giving back to the very people who support your mission and cause. The message, create and maintain authenticity, transparency and accountability in your business and personal action and deeds.

Newspaper editors who see the hand writing on the wall, so to speak, are seeking Internet audiences which connect, read, comment, share and continue to build on original content. The crux of the problem is that printed resources are drying up; daily papers can no longer sustain themselves.  The gold nugget in this story is about future revenues; in the end businesses are having difficulty monetizing investment in social media.  Asked about this, Mr. Patton shared some business results, “digital revenue was 6 million a year, the year I took over; it is projected to reach 32 million next year. “ For better or worse, printed media is dying replaced with digital interaction, community participation and engagement.  Mr. Patton is transforming the news paper business into digital reality.

Social evangelist calls out social networking site a breach of privacy

Here’s a lesson, how does one lose online privacy?  www.Klout.com is a social networking site which monitors, evaluates and scores your social media connections, influence and reach.  It has come under scrutiny in the past few months when a savvy social media user, Tonie Rise, blogger, saw her children pop-up on her Klout network.  She knew that they did not have Klout accounts.  What she did know they had Facebook accounts.  She ‘friended’ them on Facebook to guide their social interactions.  What she did not know is that by having them on her Facebook friend list, Klout automatically generated a Klout page based on her Facebook connections. Is this a breach of online privacy?

This social media evangelist took to the Internet and blog-sphere to research whether in fact users have lost sight of their privacy.  What she discovered is that one’s digital foot print takes others along whether they like to or not. Klout gathers public information from (i.e. Facebook posts, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Foursquare, etc) engagements and lifts data from 13 separate networks with the content one creates, scores its interaction with your network.  Klout counts ones network numbers, scores interactions users have with one another. The realization that a site lifts public information, sets up a user account without the knowledge of the user did not sit well with Internet and social media community.

The lesson, do not connect Facebook or other networking sites to Klout. The privacy discussion and fire storm created such a stir on the Internet, Klout changed their policy.  It no longer automatically creates Klout accounts “of minors or anyone else, and every Klout user can now delete a profile entirely.”  Facebook also weighted in by stating it was researching whether Klout broke Facebook terms of agreement.  Those of us, who embrace, join and participate in social networking and social media sites have implicitly or explicitly given up our privacy.  However does that mean those who follow, comment and recommend our posts, blogs have also acquiesced?  What role and responsibility does the Internet community and social media sites play in protecting under age kids and users privacy?

References:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/14/business/media/paton-prepares-his-newspapers-for-a-world-without-print.html _r=1&scp=1&sq=Newspapers%20Digital%20Apostle&st=Search

Philanthropist.Org Weekly Watch

Monday, November 14, 2011-What role does social, government and corporate responsibility play in society?  In the article, “Damage limitation is urgently needed,” the question was raised about Chinese businesses which have made fortunes in the last three decades at the expense of China’s environment, public health and social activities.  Although China has lax business rules and regulation, the idea this is just a Chinese problem does not resonate.  “It is time that all businesses were held accountable for their misdeeds.”  We must focus more broadly and create global standards for social, government and corporate responsibility values.

Social responsibility is an ethical ideology or theory that believes an organization or individual has a moral and ethical responsibility to society at large. It is the responsibility of all citizens to understand and know the balance between economy and our eco-system. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_responsibility

Corporate responsibility is also called corporate conscience, corporate citizenship, a way of business self-regulation which is integrated into a business mode, a method of actively monitoring the company with the spirit of law, ethics and international norms.  The goal is to encourage company action which will make a positive difference in the lives of its citizenship and make profits.

China is not alone on corporate misdeeds and its negative impact on the world economy, environment and the public health. United States companies also struggle with the balance of corporate and social responsibility and its impact on society.  http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2011-11/11/content_14076073.htm

Equally alarming was the 60 Minutes segment on Sunday night. We learned that our republican and democratic leaders use political clout and private information for economic profit and gain. In some cases, at the expense of the public good.  The law punishes Americans who participate in in-side-trading. However people who are vote into office to uphold the public trust live by another set of rules.  60 Minutes presented political leaders from both sides of the aisle profiting from inside information in which they obtained on the job as they were briefed on sensitive banking, economic and health care data.  Whether purchasing, selling bonds, stock from inside-information or land deals, our public officials are using Washington as a playground for big earnings, profits and payouts all within the law. John Boehner, Nancy Pelosi and Congressman Bachus all benefited financially from information they obtained in their political positions.

We have laws in Congress that make it legal for these leaders to profit from the information that they are privy to.  For example when the market was crashing in 2008, some congressional leaders were trading stock and making millions.  In one case, inside information on land use gained one congressman 2 million dollars.

We learned no laws were broken; however, if we apply the definition of social and corporate responsibility to this situation, we see that our political leaders come up short on their moral and ethical responsibility to the people they serve.  We have millions of Americans out of work, no longer living in their homes and unable to pay their bills.  As American families struggle across the country, political leaders single handedly bankrupted a country, economically, socially, morally and ethically, for their own personal  gain.  We now have a burgeoning industry in Washington, political intelligence lobbyist, those who broker private information in the halls of our government for the economic gain of a few while the many suffer.

 

 

 

National Philanthropy Week

November 11th was National Philanthropy day in Ithaca New York where four local leaders were awarded in recognition of their work in the community. “Arthur Kuckes, Cornell University professor and CEO of Vector Magnetics, for philanthropist of the year; Larry Baum , founder and CEO of The Computing Center, as volunteer fundraiser of the year; and Brigid Hubberman, executive director of the Family Readership Partnership, who has been tapped for outstanding professional achievement in non-profit leadership. The corporate philanthropist award will go to Seneca Beverage.” http://www.theithacajournal.com/article/20111111/NEWS01/111110333/Ithaca-philanthropists-honored-giving?odyssey=mod%7Cnewswell%7Ctext%7CFRONTPAGE%7Cs

It is the season for giving and it appears that many organizations are in full fundraising force this holiday season.  Many state charity organizations are taking this day as an opportunity to raise awareness among young adults by recognizing individuals and corporations for outstanding philanthropic work for 2011. Fargo North Dakota http://www.inforum.com/event/article/id/340285/group/News/

In the Texas Panhandle, faith and generosity go hand in hand when Mr. and Mrs. Barnes donate jewelry, a gold cross, to devoted volunteers for the work they do for their neighborhood and churches. The Barnes are low key individuals who do not wish to be in the spot light, however, their neighbors and professional peers think otherwise, Janet Byars, chair of the event which is honoring the Barnes, says, “I think it’s important that we talk about it because (philanthropy) does affect everybody. ”   We agree and this is why we also want to recognize the Barnes for continuing the spirit of giving and making a difference in the lives of others. http://amarillo.com/lifestyle/2011-11-11/day-honors-philanthropists#.Tr-20z0r2so

The Florida Times Union online blog, Jacksonville.com reports the winners for the 2011 National Philanthropy Day.  At a luncheon at the Hyatt Regency, the community gathered to listen and learn how outstanding individuals are changing the world of philanthropy one generous act at a time.  This years outstanding individuals and corporations are:
Outstanding Philanthropists — Linda and Vince Ferrigno.
Outstanding Volunteer Fundraisers — Paul and Amy Wilson.
Outstanding Foundation — Neviaser Charitable Foundation Inc.
Outstanding Corporation — Miller Electric Company.
Outstanding Civic Organization — Knights of Columbus Father Murphy Council No. 5535.
Outstanding Youth in Philanthropy — Tre-Ellis Scott.
Outstanding Young Professional Organization — The Discovery Circle. http://jacksonville.com/opinion/blog/400721/beth-cravey/2011-11-11/first-coast-philanthropists-be-honored-monday-event

The Mark J. Gordon Foundation of Southern Florida has raised over 3.5 million dollars since it’s inception in 2005.  Mr. Gordon is not satisfied; however, he wants to do more.  He realizes that giving money is only one piece of the giving strategy.  In order to maintain and sustain philanthropy over the course of time, we need to seed and grow philanthropy among the next generation.  To achieve that goal, Mr. Gordon launched a new program called “SHAPE-Students Helping Achieve Philanthropic Excellence,” the aim is for after school program to shape young people to be leaders in the world of philanthropy.  It is more than writing a check, it’s about involvement being a part of something that is greater than you.  Young people are learning that their actions can have a major impact on the lives of others less fortunate.  The program is now in 41 high schools across Miami-Dade County and the plan is to grow across the state.  Mr. Gordon is seeding a generation of philanthropist and we recognize him for his outstanding leadership. http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/11/11/2498967/shape-aims-to-turn-high-school.html

 

 

 

Online Banking In Bangladesh

Now a days Online Banking is getting popularity day by day in Bangladesh. Maximum number of local and public bank  has been started their banking system in online for fast banking and I am giving here some example like HSBC, City Bank, BRAC Bank, Bank Asia, Jamuna Bank, Janata Bank, Southeast Bank, AB Bank, First Security Bank, Mercantile Bank, Premier Bank etc .

It is used for mainly fund transfers and payment of utility bills on the internet. The new passage allows publics to use local currency credit cards for online transactions within the country. Online Banking service was started in Bangladesh by Bangladesh Bank on a small scale. And of course I think It will boost the use of e-commerce and online banking facilities, helping subscribers of all profitable banks in Bangladesh.

Bangladesh Bank Governor Atiur Rahman said “This will create a revolution in e-commerce and online banking,”. I am totally agree with him although there are some problems. The almost 40% people are not highly educated in Bangladesh and they are confused about the system but we (students) are trying to remove their fear.

Hopefully after some years we will see that Bangladesh will be an example of Online Banking.

Spirit of philanthropy needed in republican debates

Philanthropy, generosity, is something which comes from your heart, taking action if you are so fortunate comes in way of your pocket book.  The good for humanity lives in our soul, manifesting itself in act of kindness, empathy and compassion.  At Wednesday night’s Republican Presidential Debate, Your Money, Your Vote,  there was little compassion gentleness and thoughtfulness to go around among the candidates for the President of the United States. Moderated by Maria Bartiromo and MSNBC colleagues, they did their best to focus the debaters on answering the question; often candidates would go off topic, off message and in one case off the deep end.

Rather than speak about their plans to put Americans back to work, fix the economy and rebuild physical infrastructure, they ridicule a government and instill a lack of confidence and trust in the very institution they want to govern. Americans are fed up with special interest groups, greed, corruption and complete political stagnation. The shortcomings of all politicians, big business and government to compromise, cooperate and find fair and equitable solutions is frustrating a nation, instilling zero confidence.  The nine presidential hopefuls, Rick Santorum, Michelle Bachman, Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, Ron Paul, Herman Cain, Jon Huntsman did not instill much more.  All want to eliminate big government.  None defined what that entails; too much government, just right, but one thing is for sure from Ms. Bachman perspective, ‘freedom isn’t free. Everyone has to pay.” Dr. Paul announced that spending is a disease and we should eliminate the Federal Reserve.  Mr. Perry promised if elected President, he is going to pretty much wipe out the departments of education, commerce and it took him twenty minutes to remember energy. He also wants to de-regulate industries starting with the financial ones.  Too Big to Fail and Margin Call are movies which illustrate just why government and business need cooperation and collaboration. We need transparency, accountability, checks and balances.  The fact that political leaders, who are elected to hold public trust, would want to privatize social security and other vital social programs, actually hand-over total fiduciary responsibility of people and families futures after the run on Wall Street is irresponsible if not just plain negligent.

Clearly the candidates are successful, wealthy, and fortunate to have done quite well living the American dream.  Doctors, lawyers, successful business leaders all want to lead the free world, yet, as we learn from Ms. Bachman, nothing is free. The candidates talk about crisis in trust and leadership, close the loop holes, cut state and federal programs, kill federal student loan program and eliminate entitlement programs.  As a matter of fact, candidate Perry actually said, kill the federal government. He stumbles to try to name the three he would abolish first. Candidates believe if we roll back banking and financial regulation before 2008, the market will bounce back. Amazing that social security, Medicaid, Medicare, student loans, health insurance, education, energy and commerce, all elements which American society benefit from will go away.

We did not hear about curbing or slashing spending on military, international aid, nation building, nor did they mention rolling back tax breaks for large corporations which post billions in profits. As far as all the republican candidates are concerned get the federal government out of our lives, our health, no bail outs, and no social and educational programs. Mandate everything to the states.

Mr. Romney who had real successes in collaboration between government, private and NGO sectors in Massachusetts actually did not want to be reminded of that.  Mr. Romney, who speaks of jobs building, an executive at the head of Bain Capital, bought and sold companies eliminating jobs.  Unfortunately, we did not hear compelling solutions or powerful strategies to minimize the risk to the most vulnerable, create jobs, and provide fair and equitable approaches to growing disparities in our country.

We also listened intently to hear how our leaders would make government more authentic, transparent and accountable to the people they serve.  We waited to hear the spirit of philanthropy, the good for humanity, acts of kindness, empathy and compassion. We are still waiting.

Defining Ethical Versus Legally Required Corporate Governance

Ethics are the driving force often leading to creation of new laws and regulations. Because law is not usually adequate at preventing corporate governance risk and harm to investors, ethical compliance and standards increase organizational security and health. More employees and businesses need to examine the relationship between law and ethical standards, in order to succeed and compete.

Watch your thoughts; they become words. Watch your words; they become actions. Watch your actions; they become habits. Watch your habits; they become character. Watch your character, it becomes your destiny.

Character of Good People and Good Business

Business is often expected to respond to issues of ethical principles of moral philosophy, including justice, rights, and more. These higher standards of performance, even through they may not be required by law, become part of an organization’s business policy and standards. These policies and standards define the organizational operating patterns and behaviors, which defines the image, culture, and governance that is allowed by the organization. A gap analysis of what is and what should be within organizations can readily identify many areas where management and boards need reform.

Imagine the disaster this could cause your organization if people incorrectly read laws to only suit their purposes.When they make assumptions about what is required by the law, organizations find themselves making costly and irresponsible behavior. As an American Bar Association approved certified paralegal with experience in the legal industry, one of my pet peeves is someone who does not research the law reads a law assuming a self-serving application of the law and incorrectly applies it and embarrasses the legal department or makes improper judgement. These types of managers are risky. It does not matter what the law reads alone. It also matters how it is applied and interpreted by the courts. Unless you have legal counsel defining interpretations, caution reliance and decisions from non-legal managers who can risk the company assets and more by violating the law.

Your state law may be applied differently than your federal law. Your organization (and union) may already be required to follow state legal requirements within a collective bargaining agreement. Sometimes business organizations and unions, by law, are required to meet issues like state discrimination laws, which can differ from federal law, and can govern many business activities, including hiring employees.

Failure to make realistic and good faith efforts to implement basic ethical standards corrupts other business dealings and practices. The lack of ethical standards means managers start assuming what is and what is not required by law because a culture of integrity and compliance is not properly invested.  If you do not work on measurable metrics, you organization ends up with poorly defined and executed standards that read differently to individual managers. Soon, policy enforcers will end up genuinely too overwhelmed to actively respond to issues.

Managers are also too often enabled to believe that experience is a safety net. Managers sign up for poorly chosen company L&D (learning and development)  programs that last a few lunch periods and over 10 or more years lose knowledge and gain very little necessary cross-functional skills, particularly with the changing landscape of legal compliance. Managers take lower level non-management employee training, focus on too many soft skills, or ignore weaknesses by only focusing on the company strength based celebration programs and career “find myself” training. The L&D situtational leadership program neglects managerial weakness in hard skills, including cross-functional abilities in legal compliance, focusing on style and the employee leaves thinking that his or her way will always be best based on the situation. They leave empowered by their sense of instinct and the safety net of their experience.

Any m